Regional Pearls - Mobile App Design
A mobile application that assists anesthesiologists of all levels with learning about, preparing for, and performing anesthetic procedures. This project was an undergraduate capstone project done at the University of Washington and sponsored by Seattle Children’s Hospital.
Timeline: 6 months, January - June 2017
Team: Angela Chen, Peyton Foucht, Kurt Blancaflor, Charlotte Dissmore
My Role: UX Generalist - Researcher, Interaction/UX Designer
UW HCDE Capstone Project sponsored by Seattle Children's Hospital.
This 6-month long project was a culmination of all the skills related to design and research that we learned and practiced in the Human-Centered Design & Engineering (HCDE) program at the University of Washington. In June 2017, we presented our final prototype, poster, and video at the HCDE Open House alongside other HCDE undergrads and masters students.
We were one vote away from winning the Best Design award out of 40 participating teams.
View our team's project poster that we showcased at the Open House!
The Problem
Anesthesiology is a complex medical practice that requires incredible precision and sound technique. Patients depend on anesthesiologists to ensure that they are safe and comfortable during and after a surgery. When it comes to regional anesthesia, where only part of the body is affected, the complex webbing of nerves in the body can make it difficult and confusing to determine the best course of action for an anesthetic block.
Aside from hands-on practice, anesthesiologists, especially those who are just beginning their career, turn to textbooks, journals, videos, etc. to learn about and prepare for procedures. With so many different resources in a variety of mediums and in such a fast-paced, high-stress environment, it’s difficult to know where to even begin to prepare for a procedure. While there certainly is not a lack of resources, what is lacking is a single, comprehensive platform that helps guide and assist novice practitioners from preparation to actually executing a block.
How can a mobile application increase safety, speed, and accuracy for anesthesiologists who are preparing for a regional block procedure?
Our Process
Research
Surgery prep for the anesthesiologist and various nurses and assistants
Observational Field Study
"They think they know [what type of block to perform]" - Dr. Corrie Anderson, 30+ years of experience, Seattle Children’s Hospital
Through this 6-hour field study at Seattle Children's Hospital, we were able to observe and ask questions to the anesthesiologists while in the context of their work environment. We were able to see their natural process of preparing for a surgery and gain a better understanding of how they select the appropriate block based on the type of surgery, patient anatomy and health, and other significant factors. We synthesized our data into four categories: team interaction, preparation/process, app expectations, and pain points.
Using the findings from this study, we developed a survey with questions that would help validate these initial findings, identify common resources, and familiarize us with preparation methods.
Survey
Through our survey, we sought to answer three main questions:
How do anesthesiologists prepare for regional blocks that they are unfamiliar with?
Do they use resources to prepare and if so, what types of resources do they use?
How often do they consult these resources?
Survey results showed that less experienced anesthesiologists (0-10 years) often used NYSORA (New York School of Regional Anesthesia), an e-learning system, as a preparation tool. Those with more experience (20+ years) rarely used any resources to prepare but when they did, they turned to their colleagues for help.
Not only did these findings help us develop interview questions to gather more details, but they also helped us narrow down our target user to those with less than 5 years of experience, or "novice" users.
Interviews
We interviewed two anesthesiologists - one with 3 years of experience and another with 28 years of experience. The goal of the interviews was to pinpoint what specific information in available resources is most valuable to their preparation process and what triggers their need to reference resources.
Anesthesiologists reference both online and offline resources (colleague discussions) but the need for using these resources can depend on the amount of prep time given or their comfortability in performing that specific block. There are also many factors related to the patient that they must consider when determining the best course of action; sometimes, even deciding not to do a procedure that might harm the patient.
Design Opportunities
Peter, a second-year resident
Other target users: Interns, residents, 1-5 years of hands-on experience in regional anesthesiology
Design Ideation & Prototyping
Sketching
After synthesizing and analyzing the findings from our research, we defined a list of components before doing some preliminary sketches to establish the general interactions and overall workflow.
Ideation discussion with Andrew, a third-year anesthesiologist at UW Medicine.
Participatory Design Sessions
As part of our ideation phase, we conducted two participatory design sessions. The first was an ideation session with a third-year anesthesiologists at UW Medicine to determine a logical workflow, discuss our preliminary sketches and ideas, and generate expectations for content.
The second participatory design session came after we iterated on our sketches and converted them into to a low-fidelity wireframe. We consulted our stakeholder through a cognitive walkthrough of our app and were able to confirm some of our design choices while also defining areas of improvement.
Prototyping
Taking the ideas and findings from our participatory design sessions and research, we iterated on our wireframes and produced a low-fidelity, interactive prototype that we used to test the participants in our usability study.
Evaluation & Iteration
Usability Testing
To evaluate the design, workflow, and interactions of our prototype, we recruited six participants and tested them in the anesthesiologists' break room at Seattle Children's. They were given three tasks to complete, followed by six post-test questions to assess their overall experience with the prototype and to identify areas of improvement.
Based on the analysis of the usability study and some additional guidance from our sponsor, we aimed to improve the labeling and include additional educational information, interactions on the diagram, and the different orientations of the diagram.
Design Principles
Final Concept
Select the region of the surgery
Select the appropriate surgical region from a full body diagram with anterior and posterior views (back and front) of the body
This allows the user to focus on the specific region and view blocks that are only relevant to that area
Compare the nerve coverage and distribution of the most relevant blocks for that surgical region
View a list of regional blocks that are relevant to the specified surgical region
Compare the nerve coverage and distribution for each type of block across each tissue layer - dermatome (skin), myotome (muscle), osteotome (bone)
Each block covers a variety of different nerves, which are mapped to a specific color and displayed on the diagram. The grey region represents nerves that are not covered by the block
Know exactly which blocks completely cover the surgical region
This assists the user in making the the most well-informed decision about what block they need to perform for any given surgery based on anatomy
Study the details of a specific block
Dive into a specific block and view additional information about that block including ultrasound images, contraindications (specific situations in which a drug, procedure, or surgery should not be used), techniques, video demos, recognized risks, etc.
There are a lot of other factors beyond anatomy that the user needs to take into consideration when deciding on the right block. This provides all the available, relevant information that the user might need to take into account to decide on and prepare for an anesthetic procedure
Reflection & Future Implications
This project posed many challenges for us as both researchers and designers. One of the biggest and most time-consuming obstacles was understanding the basics of anesthesiology. We did a lot of research about various blocks in order to get a better idea of the users needs and pain points. We also had a hard time mapping blocks to the associated nerve coverage due to our lack of expertise in the field and some difficulties in communicating with our sponsor. As a result, we were not able to obtain any validation that the information we provided about block coverage was accurate. Though having accurate information is not vital to testing the prototype, a few of our usability study participants made comments about the content that was provided.
Another constraint came in our choice of prototyping tool - Proto.io. Some of the interactions that we had envisioned for our app could not be simulated entirely. The final version lacks a few of our intended interactions that could have potentially made the experience more seamless and easier to learn for the user. Hopefully, future iterations of this app will be able to incorporate those planned interactions.
In the current prototype, there are some features that we did not prototype because they were outside the scope of our project goals. One of the major improvements we would make is being able to incorporate unique patient health information directly into the app. This would help the user narrow down and decide on the best block to perform. Because many factors regarding the patient’s history and physiology must be taken into consideration before deciding on a block, it would help streamline the process for the anesthesiologist if the app was able to factor that information into the list of relevant blocks.
We will continue to work with our sponsors to iterate on our designs and connect with a developer in hopes that they can present our work at a conference in October to presidents at various medical/anesthesiology organizations.